The devil wants everyone who has anything more than his basic needs to feel guilty. This presents a very puzzling problem to the Christian as he attempts to understand the relationship

between sacrifice and prosperity. Prosperity must have a high priority among

divine gifts.

Solomon: "Wisdom and knowledge is granted unto thee; and I will give

thee riches and wealth"
(2 Chron. 1: 12).

John: "Beloved, I wish above all things that thou mayest prosper

and be in health, even as thy soul prospereth"
(3 John 2).

A person exercises

his God-given talents; God blesses him and he prospers. Then, he is subjected

to articles, and sermons on sacrificeall implying the giving of material

things. There are some interesting, sometimes tragic reactions:

He gives liberally, but still feels guilty for he has so much


He rejects all suggestions to giving, for he dreads poverty.

He may resent it. One lady, who was approached for financial

assistance for church support, said, "If giving to the church means

sacrificing all the things I have worked and saved for all my lifeor being

shaken outthen I'll be shaken out."

He may regard the giving of money as a substitute for personal


Ps. 50:5: "Gather my saints together unto me, those who have made a

covenant with me by sacrifice."

The popular thought

is that this text refers to material things, and those who sacrifice money, or

its equivalent, for God's cause, will be among the throng who await their

Lord's return. In other words, their giving of material things will make them

eligible. But, does the giving of material things constitute sacrifice?

If this were

correct, then a total sacrifice would be the giving of everything a person had,

and he would be left destitute. In this condition he would not be able to

support himself, his family, nor his church. In fact, he would be totally

helpless for he would have nothing with which to do anything productive at all.

Likewise, his

testing period would come to an end, for each person has been entrusted with

material things, to determine their ability to manage eternal responsibilities.

If sacrifice means

the giving of things, then Abraham, Isaac, Joseph, Daniel, and many others did

not make a covenant with God by sacrificefor they died very wealthy men. And

still, they were accounted worthy of eternal life.

Another concept of

sacrifice is "trading." This means that a man could trade earthly

things for heavenly. Many false religions are based on this trading, or buying

theory. However, this concept has major problems. Consider these texts in

relation to this topic:


earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof"
(Ps. 24:1).


beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle on a thousand hills"
(Ps. 50:10).


silver and the gold is mine"
(Hag. 2:8).

If then, everything

on the earth belongs to God, what could a person possibly use for trading

material? The first thing a person needs to know, when trading, is if the

person with whom he is dealing, owns what is being traded. If he doesn't, then

there is a real possibility he will lose everything in the transaction: what he

traded, as well as what he received in return.

God certainly isn't

going to accept things in trade which He owns in the first place. Hence the

premise is wrong.

It should be carefully noted in the text that the

key word is not sacrifice, but covenant.

Those will be gathered in that great day who have made a covenant with Godin

this instance, by sacrifice. By sacrificing what?

For thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give it; thou delightest not in burnt offerings. The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit; a broken spirit and a contrite heart. O God. thou wilt not despise."

Psalms 51:16,17

What Is a Covenant?

A covenant is an

agreement to do, or not to do a certain thing. It is a contract between two

individuals, two groups, or an individual with a group, etc. God made such an

agreement with Noah.

"I do

set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be a token of a covenant between me and

the earth ... and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all

(Gen. 9:13-15).

With Abraham:

"And I

will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name

great; and thou shalt be a blessing"


Now consider

Abraham's predicament:

If God had given

Abraham a choice: give Him all his possessions, and keep his sonorgive Him the

son, and keep his possessions; there is no question what he would have done.

That boy was his greatest possession. Nothing else was of so great value. But

... God didn't give him a choice; He asked for the boy.

After that

agonizing trip to Mount Moriah, when Abraham was about to kill his son, God

would say, "Now I know that thou fearest God,

seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son from me"
(Gen. 22:12).

If sacrifice means

the giving of material things, Abraham would have had to kill the boy, but God

accepted the fact that he was willingthat he obeyed God's instructions, rather

than his own desires. This test proved more to Abraham, than it did to God. God

already knew Abraham could pass the testnow Abraham knew it. This only proved that

Abraham's covenant with God was genuine.

Although God owns

the world and everything in it, there is one thing over which He chooses not to

exercise control: our heartsour wills. The power of choice given in the Garden

of Eden, and restored by Jesus on the Cross of Calvary, belongs to the

individual. A classic example of this occurred during the reign of King David.

He had stained his

illustrious career with the foul blot of adultery and murder. The enormity of

his crime was pointed out to him by the prophet Nathan. In Psalm 51, David is

pouring out his heart to God in confessionseeking relief from his guilt. He

pleads with God, "Have mercy on me, O

God; Wash me thoroughly from mine iniquity, and cleanse me from my sin; I

acknowledge my transgression; Purge me with hyssop and I shall be clean; Create

in me a clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me."
All these statements show the intensity of his feelings and his

desire for forgiveness. Then he recognizes what sacrifice really is.

Psalms 51:16,17: "For thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give it; thou

delightest not in burnt offerings. The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit; a

broken spirit and a contrite heart. O God. thou wilt not despise."

What is a broken

spirit? It is the positive response of the human heart to God's instruction and


Wild animals have

uncontrolled spirits. Only when this spirit is "broken," can they be

made to do the will of manto be obedient to his direction and command. But, God

doesn't "break" our spirits; He pleads, "My son, give me thine heart"

(Prov. 23:26).

The human heart is

like that of the untamed beasts; it is selfish, and self-willed. If left to

itself, it will only grow more determined to have its own way.

What Is Sacrifice?

From that

illustration, a definition of sacrifice can be made. It is the willingness to

relinquish the entire life to God, without any reservations. This means that a

covenant relation is entered into by a person with God, in which all of his

time, talents, influence, and material goods are under divine direction and

control, at all timesunder all circumstances.

How is this

accomplished? In the common walks of life; in everyday transactions; in the

little acts of lifeit is dying daily to self. Paul said, "I die daily" (1 Corinthians

15:31). "I have fought a good fight" (2 Tim. 4:7). Who was Paul fighting? Enemies, false brethren? All

of these, but his greatest battle was with himself. "For the good that I would I do not; but the evil which I

would not, that I do"
(Romans 7:19). This was Paul's

constant battle; It is the battle of every human being for as prophet Jeremiah

wrote, "The heart is deceitful above all

things, and desperately wicked; who can know it"
(Jer. 17:9).

Consider sacrifice,

not as giving, nor trading, but rather as using. This would harmonize with

God's plan in the beginning. As agents of heaven, we would be continually

receiving God's blessings, and distributing these to others. We would be in

constant communication with the Owner. Our instructions would come from:

His Word

A knowledge of need

Divine impressions "And

thine ears shall hear a voice"
(Isa. 30:21).

This knowledge and

awareness of our relationship to God would prevent us from having pride of

ownership. It would also be a great wall against selfishness. (We would never

substitute giving for personal service.) We would never feel guilty about our

possessions, for we would be earning, saving, using, and giving under God's


This is true

stewardship. The wrongness is not in possessing things, but in claiming

ownership and using our resources according to our own selfish interests.

While some might

think that money can buy anything, there is something it cannot buy, nor can it

be a substitute for personal services. God isn't interested in our money (He

could speak and create mountains of gold); He is interested in usour heartsour

choice to obey Him.

And this

willingness to place our hearts on the altar is the supreme sacrifice which He

desires. Once we do this, we will have made a covenant with Him by sacrifice

(the only thing over which we have control)then we can hear the "well

done" given to those who recognize their stewardship relation to Him and

be a part of that vast throng who await His return.

A Closing Thought

If Jesus could have

given things for our salvation, he could have given a universebut it cost him

His life. And that's what it will cost usour lives that is all we have to give.

Mel Rees

sermon is reprinted with permission from
"Biblical Principles for Giving and Living"

published in 1995 by The Ministerial Association, General Conference of

Seventh-day Adventists, 12501 Old Columbia Pike, Silver Spring, Maryland,

20904; 301-680-6502;